![]() ![]() Person A got caught in an embarrassing episode. Sure, but statements like that are all gravy for a politician. In another chat, the News said Micciche told them, "he disagreed with those settlements" and that the people who received them "deserved no money." messages and outraged that the employees who were involved received severance payments," Micciche told the News recently. The settlements that spurred this issue recently were for $80,000 and $22,000 paid to the former head of personnel and a top assistant after they were fired over naughty "instant messages" turned up by The Dallas Morning News in an Open Records sweep. But so far the remarks I have seen attributed to him on this subject make him sound like he's never heard of the costs and risks of litigation versus settlements. ![]() He's a lawyer with Akin Gump, a top firm. Take, for example, board member Dan Micciche. ![]() They might suggest an audit or study to compare litigation and settlement costs at DISD with other big Texas school districts.īut their remarks so far have not been reassuring. Perhaps the school board will raise these very questions tonight. Then what? What do we think will happen to the district's ass down at the courthouse? That's the calculation, right? Here is what the calculation is not: the calculation is not, "Let's not offer settlements to people in cases where elected school trustees might be able to score a few points politically by going hardcore about it on TV." That's a formula for losing your ass at court. Tell her after the door hits in the ass the next time we'll see that ass is in court." But that's the math you have to do, right? You don't get to just say, "We're mad at that person, so don't offer her any money. Maybe they've been too chicken, handing out too much money too quickly. They make settlement offers to avoid the expense and risk of litigation.ĭoesn't mean they're right every time. So have those school trustees - the door-ass contingent - asked the district's lawyers what the history is on litigation where there has been no settlement and no settlement offer? I mean, isn't that the whole question? Or is this strictly about posturing in front of the cameras no matter how much damage it does to the district?Īre we asked to believe that the school district hands five- and six-figure settlements to fired people just for fun? C'mon. The political message is that the administration has been paying people settlements when it should have just told them not to let the door hit them in the ass. Hey, can I just ask something? Dallas ISD trustees are slated to discuss a proposal barring pay-outs to terminated or otherwise departing employees unless those settlements have been voted on and approved by the school board. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |